Made Of Dreams


The Method Of Dream Interpretation - 7 - Freud

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive


The Method Of Dream Interpretation - 7 - Freud

Dr.M. is pale; his chin is shaven, and he limps. Of this so much is correct, that his unhealthy appearance often arouses the concern of his friends. The other two characteristics must belong to another person. An elder brother living abroad occurs to me, for he, too, shaves his chin, and if I remeber him rightly, the M. of the dream bears on the whole a certain resemblance to him.

And some days previously the news arrived that he was limping on account of an arthritic affection of the hip. There must be some reason why I fuse the two persons into one in my dream. I remember that, in fact, I was on bad terms with both of them for similar reasons. Both had rejected a certain proposal which I had recently made them.

My friend Otto is now standing next to the patient, and my friend Leopold examines her and calls attention to a dullness low down on the left side. my friend Leopold is also a physican, and a relative of Otto's.

Since the two practice the same speciality, fate has made thwm competitors, so they are constantly being compared with one another. Both of them assisted me for years, while I was still directing a public clinic for neurotic children. These, scenes, like that reproduced in my dream had often taken place. While I was discussing the diagnosis of a case with Otto, Leopold would examine the child anew and make an unexpected contribution towards our decision.

There was a difference of character between the two men like that between Inspector Brasig and his friend karl. Otto was remarkably prompt and alert; Leopold was slow and thoughtful, but thorough. If I contrast Otto and the cautious Leopold in the dream I do so, apparently to extol Leopold. The comparison is like that made above between the disobedient patient Irma and her friend, who was believed to be more sensible.

I now become aware of one of the tracks along with association of ideas in the dream proceeds: from the sick child to the children's clinic. Concerning the dullness low on the left side, I have the impressionthat it corresponds with a certain case of which all the details were similar, a case in which Leopold impressed me by his thoroughness.

I though vaguely, too, of something like a metastaic affection, but it might be a reference to the patient whom I should have liked to have in Irma's place. For this lady as far as I can gather, exhibited symptoms which imitated tuberculosis.

An infiltrated portion of skin on the left shoulder, I know at once that is my own rheumatism of the shoulder, which I always feel if I lie awake long at night. The very phrasing of the dream sounds ambiguous: "Someting which I can feel, as he does, in spite of the dress.' 'Feel on my own body' is intended. Further, it occurs to me how unusual the phrase 'infiltrated portion of skin' sounds.

We are accoustomed to the phrase 'an infiltration of the upper posterior left; this would refer to the lungs, and thus, once more, to tuberculosis.

In spite of the dress. This to be sure, is only an interpolation. at the clinic the children were, of course, examined undressed; here we have some contrast to the manner in which adult female patients have to be examined. The story used to be told of an eminent physician that he always examined his patients through their clothes. The rest is obscure to me; I have frankly, no inclination to follow the matter further.

Dr. M. says it's an infection, but it doesn't matter; dysentery will follow, and the poison will be eliminated.' This, at first, seems to me ridiculous; nevertheless, like everything else, it must be carefully analysed; more closely observed it seems after all to have a sort of meaning.

What I found in the patient was a local diphtheritis. I remember the discussion about diphtheritis and diphtheria at the time of my daughter's illness. Diphtheria is the general infection which proceeds from local diphtheriitis. Leopold demonstrates the existence of such a general infection by the dullness, which also suggests a metastatic focus. I believe, however, that just this kind of metastasis does not occur in the case of diphtheria. It reminds me raher of pyaemia.

It doesn't matter is a consolation. I believe it fits in as follows: The last part of the dream has yielded a content to the effect that the patient's sufferings are the result of a serious organic affection. I begin to suspect that by this I am only trying to shift the blame from myself.

Psychic treatment cannot be held responsible for the continued presence of a diphtheric affection. Now, indeed, I am distressed by the thought of having invented such a serious illness for Irma, for the sole purpose of exculpating myself. It seems so cruel.

Accordingly, I need the assurance that the outcome will be benign, and it seems to me that I made a good choice when I put the words that consoled me into the mouth of Dr M.But here I am placing myself in a position of superiority to the dream; a fact which needs explanation. 

Reference: The Interpretation of Dreams: Sigmund Freud.




Who's on line

We have 50 guests and no members online

MailChimp Signup

Subscribe to Newsletters
Please wait

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.


Right Click

No right click